|
Alchemy Forum 1401-1450From January 25th 1996, the Alchemy forum was restructured and the messages were sequentially numbered. This is an unedited extract of messages 1401-1450.Go to next 50 messages . Back to forum archive. Subject: 1401 P.B. Randolph (was: Admiraled) Date: Thu, 25 Jul 1996 10:35:11 -0500 From: george leake >From: Roy M. Liuzza > >Re: Randolph and Bardon > >There is a good biographical chapter on Paschal Beverly Randolph in >Joscelyn Godwin's 'The Theosophical Enlightenment' (Albany: SUNY Press, >1994), pp. 247-275. No mention of Bardon, as far as I can remember, but >Godwin does connect Randolph's ideas to the Hermetic Brotherhood of Luxor. *I've been resisting bringing this up, but some scholars also assert that Randolph had considerable influence on Victorian era occultists like one Dr. Berridge and Aleister Crowley, both advocates of ceremonial or sex magick. The latter techniques are said to have sympathy with other techniques ranging from tantra to the alchemical wedding. -G.Leake, 512-471-9117 taliesin@mail.utexas.edu Subject: 1402 P.B. Randolph (was: Admiraled) Date: Thu, 25 Jul 1996 10:52:51 -0500 (CDT) From: John C. Merritt > From: Roy M. Liuzza > > Re: Randolph and Bardon > There is a good biographical chapter on Paschal Beverly Randolph in > Joscelyn Godwin's 'The Theosophical Enlightenment' (Albany: SUNY Press, > 1994), pp. 247-275. No mention of Bardon, as far as I can remember, but > Godwin does connect Randolph's ideas to the Hermetic Brotherhood of Luxor. >>>>>>>>>>>>> The Brotherhood of Luxor is covered in a book of the same title by Godwin, Christian Chanel and John P. Deveney (York Beach Maine: Samuel Weiser, 1995). No mention of Bardon, but there was definately a connection between Randolph and the Brotherhhod of Luxor. Deveney has also written a biography of Randolph entitled 'Paschal Beverly Randolph: a Nineteenth Century Black American Spiritualist, Rosicrution and Sex Magician' which is scheduled to be published in October by the State University of New York Press. ----------| John Merritt | beowulf@bga.com |--------- Subject: 1403 Julius de Evola and C.G. Jung Date: Thu, 25 Jul 96 18:33 +0100 From: Waldemar Hammel I have a question to the members of the list, which seems important to me: In one of the recent letters Evola is titled to be one of the luminaries of alchemia, in many other letters the psychoanalyst C.G. Jung is mentioned. Is it known that Julius de Evola was during World War II closely cooperating with the Italian fascists, and that after the war he was punished by the Allied forces? I read some books about Evola, his life was every thing else, but not the life of a homo illuminatus. After the war, when his reputation was down, he began to work on magic and alchemia, he was really a shady character, not internally clean, not divine, nothing of that. Should alchemia rely on such people? The same with C.G. Jung, who made up psychoanalytical theses during Hitler's government to support the fascist's racism. After the war, surely, he changed his opinion. He produced during all his life a lot of pseudo-scientific things, but the support of racism should reduce his reputation to zero! Shall we really forget all that today and rely upon that not integral, not serious person? Shall the divine art of alchemia be so cheap?? With my best regards Waldemar Hammel Subject: 1404 Dutch translations Date: Thu, 25 Jul 1996 22:04:27 +0200 From: Arianne Wopereis > From: douwe > > If there are any Dutch people around on the forum, who would like to receive > Dutch translations of alchemical works for free in order to proofread them > with a pencil at hand then I would be very happy to hear about it. > The whole lot contains the following: > > De 12 sleutels van Basilius valentinus, Atlanta vlucht van Michael Maier, > het boek van Lambspring, de Alwijze deurwachter, Het geheim van de > onsterfelijke vloeistof alcahest door Eiraneus Philaletes, De bereidingen > van de sofische mercurius door E. Philaletes, een eigen verhandeling over de > smaragden tafel, een aantal losse epigrammen en gedichten, en tot slotte de > Hieroglifische monade van John Dee. >..... > I hope that someone will be able to help me out on this. > > douwe. > darus@xs4all.nl > Sapientae apex, desperatio de rebus mundi. Beste Douwe, Ik heb je al eerder geschreven toen ik terugkwam van vakantie en je tips kreeg. Allereerst je verzoek. uiteraard ben ik van harte bereid om je vertalingen te lezen en te screnen op taal. Zeg me maar hoeveel het is en wat je nodig hebt, dan kijk ik wat ik kan doen. Verder is er iets misgegaan denk ik met mijn antwoord op jouw hulp. Ik heb het zenden met E-mail nog niet helemaal onder de knie geloof ik. Ik heb een aantal vragen nog over de tips die je schreef. Ik ben je er dankbaar voor en zal het gaan doen zoals je zei. Kan je mij laten weten of ik je ook kan schrijven, dan weet ik tenminste zeker dat het aankomt. hartelijke groet, Bas Klinkhamer Subject: 1405 Re: Tyson Date: Fri, 26 Jul 96 08:03 NZST From: Pat Zalewski This is probably out of place in forum but I will post this anyway. If you guys think Tyson is a nut, then I will tell you that it was him Llewellyns sent my 1000 page manuscript on the Golden Dawn Tarot. He questioned just about every form of magical association, and could not understand the obvious. Needless to say since Llewellyns is not publishing it I hold no brief for him. Pat zalewski Subject: 1406 Julius de Evola and C.G. Jung Date: Fri, 26 Jul 96 08:08 NZST From: Pat Zalewski >To Waldemar Hammel In reply to your post about Jungs racist statements. Is it the singer or the song you should be worried about ? Subject: 1407 Alchemical Tarot deck Date: Thu, 25 Jul 1996 13:21:21 -0700 From: Dennis William Hauck Rosemary Eileen Guiley has just published an interesting Tarot Deck and accompanying book THE ALCHEMICAL TAROT which does an excellent job of connecting the archetypal symbolism of the two hermetic arts. It seems that much of the Tarot symbolism is based on the processes of alchemy. The book/card set is published by Thorsens, an imprint of HarperCollins. Subject: 1408 Julius de Evola and C.G. Jung Date: Thu, 25 Jul 1996 15:08:24 -0500 From: george leake >From: Waldemar Hammel >Is it known that Julius de Evola was during World War II closely cooperating >with the Italian fascists, and that after the war he was punished by the Allied >forces? [edited for brevity] *I believe Godwin characterizes Evola as being so out there he was to the right of the Mussolini government. To keep this related to alchemy discussion, I think we should draw this analogy--should literary critics ignore Ezra Pound because of his wartime sympathies with the same government? Of course not. Ezra Pound was a great writer, and apparently Evola has made important contributions to the study of hermeticism. Reading him is not going to change one's spots. >The same with C.G. Jung, who made up psychoanalytical theses during >Hitler's government to support the fascist's racism. Shall the divine art >of alchemia be so cheap?? *well, argument about the veracity of this statement aside, again I would pose the same argument here--is there something in Jung that is worthwhile? And are you saying that in order for us all to study or take seriously one man's work, they have to be "a saint" in the eyes of your or somebody else's narrowly defined value system? Everyone has an achilles heel. What should be important here is whether they have anything of value for us. One should be as critical about what they accept as what they reject. -G.Leake, 512-471-9117 taliesin@mail.utexas.edu Subject: 1409 New subscriber with questions / comments From: Atheris Date: Thu, 25 Jul 96 21:45:18 +0100 ( + ) Philip O'Neil wrote on 25 Jul 1996: snip >Our good friend Edward Kelley ( real name Talbot) wandering around >England after having his ears lopped off by a Lancashire executioner >for fraud.... I thoroughly enjoyed your amusing, intelligent and, *above all*, well-written posting. It was a real treat to read some grammatically and syntactically correct English. Doesn't seem to happen too often these days..... With regard to Meyrinck's 'Der Engel vom Westlichen Fenster', although I have not read it for years and years I do however seem to remember that St.Dunstan is mentioned, and that the red and white phials were in some way brought into connection with him? Perhaps you remember (easier to ask you than for me to wade through the whole book again!)? Adrian Monk Subject: 1410 Gnosis Magazine - European subscription From: Sean Brooks Date: Thu, 25 Jul 1996 13:08:32 -0700 Here is the address for European subscriptions to Gnosis Magazine. Chthonios Books 7 Tamarisk Steps Hastings TN34 3DN, UK PH. 0424-433-302 price 23.90 pounds for 1 year (4 issues) outside Britain 26.90 (air mail) checks, eurochecks,visa or access/mastercard/eurocard Sean Subject: 1411 Surrealism and alchemy - Bosch From: Jon Marshall Date: Fri, 26 Jul 1996 09:39:11 -0700 > For alchemy and Bosch see: > > Laurinda S. Dixon - Alchemical Imagery in Bosch's Garden Of Delights. > UMI Research Press, 1981. [This is a revised version of her Ph.D. thesis at > Boston University.] there is also the correspondence from the alchemy forum on this subject at http://www.levity.com/alchemy/f-bosch.html from the days when I was among the most verbose people on this list :) jon Subject: 1412 Alchemical Tarot deck Date: Fri, 26 Jul 96 12:02 NZST From: Pat Zalewski >From: Dennis William Hauck > >Rosemary Eileen Guiley has just published an interesting Tarot Deck and >accompanying book THE ALCHEMICAL TAROT which does an excellent job of >connecting the archetypal symbolism of the two hermetic arts. It seems >that much of the Tarot symbolism is based on the processes of alchemy. >The book/card set is published by Thorsens, an imprint of HarperCollins. Could you post her alchemical associations to the trumps? Subject: 1413 New subscriber with questions / comments Date: Thu, 25 Jul 1996 20:30:06 -0500 (CDT) From: David Roberts > >From: David Roberts > > For some > >private research I am trying to recall the source of a story I once read. From Philip O'Neil > Our good friend Edward Kelley ( real name Talbot) wandering around England > after having his ears lopped off by a Lancashire executioner for fraud > supposedly came across a strange manuscript in a Welsh Inn which was found > along with two ivory phials in the grave of a monk. One contained a red > powder, the other white and with these an indecipherable text. (snip) > which fills Dee with such dread that he throws them from the window. > (snip) as Dees character is juggled between adept and > spy whose European adventures were nothing more than undercover operations > for his loyal service to Queen and country. From David Roberts: Dear Mr. O'Neil, Profound thanks for this information. A further query, if I may be permitted ... If this story describes, then, what we might call the transmogrification process, does it also describe (after dissolution and sublimation) a separation? And from whom or what is the adept separated? In other words, is it possible to serve Queen and country & God at once? Regards, David Roberts Subject: 1414 Franciscans & alchemy From: Jon Marshall Date: Fri, 26 Jul 1996 11:40:08 -0700 Some people may remember long ago there was a discussion on the forum about alchemy, monasteries and the inquisition. A new book (Andrea De Pascalis, Alchemy the Golden Art, Gremese, Rome 1995) contains some futher information which i will inflict upon people here. Br. Elias Buonbarone (of Crotona) joined the Franciscans in 1211. He travelled with the crusaders to Syria in 1217 returning in 1221. On St Francis' death in 1227 he was one of the contenders for succession to leadership of the order, which position he obtained in 1232 and from which he was deposed on charges of heresy, but more likely for being out of his political depth as a go between between Gregory IX and Frederick II. The Franciscan chronicler Salimbene of Adam complained (c.1258) of "the infamy he [Elias] brought upon himself by having taken an active interest in the practise of alchemy. In fact whenever rumour reached his ears that there were friars within the order who had studied this science of deception he would summon them to stay with him at the Gregorian Palace" and retels a story of Gerard of Cremona being troubled by noises he attributed to demons when staying there in 1247. De pascalis suggests also that this is the Elias mentioned by Michael Scot. [Thorndike in his book on Scot agrees with this identification but is doubtful Scot wrote the books in question] I don't want to repeat the dates of the baning of alchemy in monasteries again, but De pascalis quotes from ch 113 of the 1279 edition of the Friars minors' Constitutiones Generales Antique. "Similarly, may the minister-general together with the general chapter categorically forbid in the name of the Holy Spirit, any friar to practise or teach the techniques of alchemy, necromancy, spellcasting, magic or any other superstition or sorcery or operation pertaining to other questionable doctrines and arts that are not carried out in the light of day or that are forbidden by the Church, and in general any form of deceptive or loathsome activity such as the summoning of demons or the casting of spells on people and things. May no friar dare to possess, write, prepare for himself or for others, lend or give to others, ask for or receive in any way books or writings on such things...." As well as the franciscans and dominicans, the Cistercians also banned alchemy in 1317. De Pascalis asks why the apparantly tolerant attitude of the Church changed so rapidly at the begining of the 13th century, and suggests that this has to do with the "Third Age" movement associated with the writings of Joachim de Fiore which were condemned by the Lateran Council in 1215. He suggests that Fiore's writings were popular among Franciscans and that some Franciscan alchemists saw the coming of the Paraclete as equivalent to the resurrection of nature through the Great Work (John of Rupescissa is his example). De pascalis agrees the decretal of John XXII is directed against coining rather than alchemy, and points out it was this pope who 9 years later issued the Bull Super illius specula which made witchcraft a heresy so that the inquisition could persue witches, and the difference between this and the bull on alchemy is obvious. Commentators on Canon and civil law also tended to ignore the anti alchemy bull. So though my earlier argument that the Church was not opposed to alchemy as such needs modification, I would still hold that alchemists were not necessarily forced to become secret by the inquisition, or Church hostility, and that levels of hostility do not seem to have been uniform over time. jon Subject: 1415 Julius de Evola and C.G. Jung Date: Thu, 25 Jul 1996 21:27:57 -0500 (CDT) From: cbr > C.G. Jung, who made up psychoanalytical theses during > Hitler's government to support the fascist's racism. After the war, surely, > he changed his opinion. He produced during all his life a lot of > pseudo-scientific things, but the support of racism should reduce his > reputation to zero! I am new to this list, and study of alchemy. I have studied jung, among others as a philosopher however, and have managed to remain ignorant of the collaboration to which you point above. would you be able to direct me to some of jung's works in which this is evident? I would mightily appreciate the enlightenment. regarding the question of the character of the adept: it seems to me that all actions and events must be read as revealing of the spirit who is their author, and so such action, consistently practiced, must evince some lack on the part of the actor. however, i also believe it important to refrain from dismissing all of a spirit's work on the basis of some of their actions. the persistence and the depth of both the thoughts and the actions must be weighed, and in the end neither may tell conclusively against the other. regards, chris Subject: 1416 Enochian Apocalypse Date: Fri, 26 Jul 1996 13:11:56 +1000 (EST) From: Gionni Di Gravio Dear Marcella, Clay and others, Clay, the ideas mentioned in the Tyson article remind me of a paper that Chris Whitby delivered at the Dee Colloquium on John Dee and the end of the world. Whitby proposed that Dee and Kelly were under the belief that they could somehow get privileged information from the angels concerning God's future intentions on the Apocalyse, and so be involved in the new world order that would ensue. The reason for the apocalyptic bend was the supernova that had appeared in the skies at the time in the constellation Cassiopeia. It formed a cross in the heavens, which gave celestial observers at the time a sign that God was about to precipitate a great occurence. Apologies if this has strayed from the alchemical focus, perhaps this topic would better be discussed on the John Dee forum. Sincerely, Gionni Di Gravio ulgd@dewey.newcastle.edu.au Archives and Special Collections, Auchmuty Library University of Newcastle, Australia Subject: 1417 New subscriber From: Stepanova Irena Date: Fri, 26 Jul 96 10:15:00 C Hello everybody, I am a new subscriber from Prague. I have graduated from the Technical University and Academy of Fine Arts and now I am a webmaster at Czech Ministry of Education and organist at St. Nicholas Church. I can recommend to you the web pages of our Czech hermetic Society Universalia www.terminal.cz/universalia. However I am wrapped into mythology so far (especially Egyptian and Greece), I know definitely that Alchemy is for me the "Science for the Future" since I am living in Prague, where Alchemy was and maybe IS very succesful. Sincerely Yours Irena Stepanova Subject: 1418 Alchemical Tarot deck From: Semi Date: Fri, 26 Jul 1996 09:51:00 +0000 > From: Dennis William Hauck > > Rosemary Eileen Guiley has just published an interesting Tarot Deck and > accompanying book THE ALCHEMICAL TAROT which does an excellent job of > connecting the archetypal symbolism of the two hermetic arts. It seems > that much of the Tarot symbolism is based on the processes of alchemy. > The book/card set is published by Thorsens, an imprint of HarperCollins. Maybe I'm an "old-time-lover" - but most of these compilations seems to lose both the original symbolism of Tarot, and the symbolism of Alchemy. (Maybe this is not the case...) Recent times (the past 100 years) launched a lot of Tarot derivates, which are just "somehow similar to Tarot", but make a total mix of ideas and symbols. Then the original Tarot, used to encryption (for example Sefer Jecira), etc. gets spoiled and lost by these... With new and new Tarot decks comes the danger of losing the only true original one and the traditions bound to it... Correct me, if I'm wrong... Semi. Subject: 1419 Dee and Kelly transmuting powder Date: Fri, 26 Jul 1996 10:24:37 +0100 From: Philip O'Neil From Adrian Monk >I thoroughly enjoyed your amusing, intelligent and, *above all*, >well-written posting. It was a real treat to read some grammatically and >syntactically correct English. Doesn't seem to happen too often these >days..... >With regard to Meyrinck's 'Der Engel vom Westlichen Fenster', >although I have not read it for years and years I do however seem to >remember that St.Dunstan is mentioned, and that the red and white >phials were in some way brought into connection with him? Perhaps >you remember (easier to ask you than for me to wade through the >whole book again!)? Later on in the book Kelley appears at Dee's house in Mortlake with the spheres that Dee managed to throw from the window earlier. Time and spirits seems somewhat fickle in the text. However, Dee realises there is something more in the red and white spheres. "I was astonished, for the colour and texture of the materia immediately called to and the frequent descriptions of the materia transmutationis of the alchymical adepts..." pg 179. Subsequently Kelley unscrews the half containing the red powder and "from the hollow cup shone the glow of the royal powder. the "Red Lion" pg 180. Kelley tells him the source of spheres and text: the grave of St Deniol whose body lay preserved and the spheres attached in a peculiar way to his mouth and forehead. Kelley alludes to St Deniol as a great adept. Their experiment with the powders produces "almost ten ounces of silver from twenty ounces of lead and from the same quantity of tin no less than ten ounces of pure gold.". Dee swears he will never use the powders to enrich himself but that he would seek to extract the secret of the lapide philosophorum from the writings found with St Deniol. I suggest those interested purchase the book as this meeting leads on to the summoning of the Angel and the strange collaboration of Dee and the earless one. Yours Philip Subject: 1420 Dee and Kelly transmuting powder Date: Fri, 26 Jul 1996 10:38:06 +0100 From: Philip O'Neil > Dear Mr. O'Neil, Profound thanks for this information. A further >query, if I may be permitted ... If this story describes, then, what we >might call the transmogrification process, does it also describe (after >dissolution and sublimation) a separation? And from whom or what is the >adept separated? In other words, is it possible to serve Queen and >country & God at once? > >Regards, > >David Roberts Dear David, Dee says (in the fictionalised diaries) "Surely I will need but a tiny amount of the powder to distill from it the important essence, this myself to live on until the day of the "Chymical marriage" with my Queen, when I shall see the Baphomet within me realised and the Crown of Life above my head. May this "Lion" from this day forward lead mw on to my Queen." The only problem being that, bessotted as he is with Queen Elizabeth whose reign seems both terrestrial and spiritual the attraction to the Queen can be seen in terms romantic, sexual and spiritual but, then again maybe that is what the good doctor is trying to work out with his laboratorial tinkerings. Yours from Prague Philip O'Neil Subject: 1421 Dutch translations Date: Fri, 26 Jul 1996 10:44:16 +0100 From: Van den Bossche Peter >> From: douwe >> >> If there are any Dutch people around on the forum, who would like to receive >> Dutch translations of alchemical works for free in order to proofread them >> with a pencil at hand then I would be very happy to hear about it. >> I hope that someone will be able to help me out on this. >> douwe. >> darus@xs4all.nl >> Sapientae apex, desperatio de rebus mundi. Graag ben ik bereid aan uw initiatief mee te werken. Peter Van den Bossche ******************************************* Van den Bossche Peter CITELEC c/o VUB-ETEC Pleinlaan 2 B-1050 Brussels Voice: 32-2-6293807 Fax: 32-2-6293620 Email: pvdbos@vnet3.vub.ac.be Subject: 1422 Some comments From: Mr Shaun de Waal Date: Fri, 26 Jul 1996 10:50:03 +0200 (SAST) I am new to this group, but I wanted to make some comments about alchemy that has resulted from trying to work thought the alchemical process in a practical way over the last five or six years. It may be that what I have to say will seem obvious to some of you so please bear with me if it is. In puzzling over the nature of alchemy, it has recently become apparent to me that the clue to the production of the philosophers stone both spiritually and materially lies in the obvious. The alchemical process deals with metals, minerals, the elements. To me the obvious conclusion is that all this points to the fact that the process of change occurs on a sub-molecular level. If you look at eastern teachings and other types of exploration of consciousness, they focus on going within and looking for various things, whether a symbol, a sound, the vibration of the universe, etc. Take this process one step further, what makes our world what it is: the combination of the elements, the molecules or rather our perception of them. This leads directly to the senses as a clue. With regard to humanity you have five senses that can be related to the five elements. Hermetic tradition does this: eyesight to fire, etc. This seems to me is a key to the unfolding process. I have alluded to this in my book "Gold Like Dust." It details some alchemical experiments written in the form of a novel and story. Orphiel in his books also alludes to this process and he has recently added new illumination for me, as to this process. I am working through this process with exercises dealing with the senses, symbols and elements related to this time to see if I can prove this further. I started last night and this morning have found an increased sense of wellbeing, but it is early yet. What do people think? Shaun de Waal ********************************************************************* Leaders of the world need to encourage people to dream. Without dreams our world will die. All great inventions, progress have come through individuals who dare to dream. Shaun de Waal Share my dreams - under penname Michael Morain:http://www.writersg.com/writers/index.html Subject: 1423 Julius de Evola and C.G. Jung From: Stuart Inman Date: Fri, 26 Jul 1996 12:46:14 GMT I view fascists, racists and similar riff-raff with horror. If Evola was always of the far right then I would not find him to be an exception. However, I am reminded that Milarepa, one of the most important figures in the Tibetan Buddhist tradition started off as a mass-murderer. How did Evola end up? Stuart Subject: 1424 Tyson Date: Fri, 26 Jul 1996 08:24:47 -0500 From: george leake >From: Pat Zalewski >This is probably out of place in forum but I will post this anyway. If you >guys think Tyson is a nut, then I will tell you that it was him Llewellyns >sent my 1000 page manuscript on the Golden Dawn Tarot. He questioned just >about every form of magical association, and could not understand the >obvious. Needless to say since Llewellyns is not publishing it I hold no >brief for him. *imho, Tyson has edited far and away the best work Llewellyn has published (Agrippa's De Occulta Philosophia). No substantive complaints have been aired yet regarding his work with that. Perhaps an air of mediocrity has rubbed off on him since? -G.Leake, 512-471-9117 taliesin@mail.utexas.edu Subject: 1425 Alchemical Tarot deck Date: Fri, 26 Jul 1996 08:21:35 -0500 From: george leake >From: Dennis William Hauck > >Rosemary Eileen Guiley has just published an interesting Tarot Deck and >accompanying book THE ALCHEMICAL TAROT which does an excellent job of >connecting the archetypal symbolism of the two hermetic arts. It seems >that much of the Tarot symbolism is based on the processes of alchemy. >The book/card set is published by Thorsens, an imprint of HarperCollins. *and in case any of you don't know this, there are other decks which have been around for decks employing alchemical and hermetic imagery, including AE Waite's Rider-Waite deck, Aleister Crowley's Thoth deck, and Lon Milo DuQuette's Tarot of Ceremonial Magick. -G.Leake, 512-471-9117 taliesin@mail.utexas.edu Subject: 1426 Dee and Kelly transmuting powder Date: Fri, 26 Jul 1996 12:36:12 -0700 From: Clay Holden Philip O'Neil wrote: >Our good friend Edward Kelley ( real name Talbot) wandering around England >after having his ears lopped off by a Lancashire executioner for fraud >supposedly came across a strange manuscript in a Welsh Inn which was found >along with two ivory phials in the grave of a monk. One contained a red >powder, the other white and with these an indecipherable text. Armed with >these Kelley charged off to see John Dee convinced that the spirits >conjured up via his scrying stone would be able to translate the text. > [...] > [various references to Meyrink's fiction snipped] I do understand that the original question addressed the legend, not the man. However... With regard to the facts of Dee and Kelly's alchemical work, one should realize that Gustav Meyrink's work "The Angel of the West Window", while entertaining, gets almost every known fact about both Dee and Kelly wrong. But then, so do nearly all fictional works and many of the purportedly non-fiction biographical accounts. In particular, so much nonsense has been written about Kelly, and he is such an easy target, that separating the facts from the fiction is probably a job which can only be accomplished by an alchemist. There is, for instance, no evidence whatever that Edward Kelly ever had his ears cropped. This "fun fact" is not backed up with evidence or dates, and has only its antiquity to recommend it. It has subsequently been trotted out and repeated by everyone who has written a biographical sketch of him. A.E. Waite (whatever his limitations as a stylist) appears to have written the best and most balanced account in his introduction to "The Alchemical Writings of Edward Kelly", where he states that "...the 'skryer' of Doctor Dee and the discoverer of the so-called 'Book of Saint Dunstan' has been accredited with many iniquities of which he does not seem to have been guilty." (In passing, it should be noted that Waite had himself been guilty of publishing the same libels in an earlier work, though he was not the author.) Waite also questions the likelihood that a man branded a criminal with cropped ears would have been welcomed in the circles he frequented, which included the royalty of more than one country. Certainly Dee would have made mention of the fact that Kelly had no ears in his personal diaries, where such a "fact" is notably absent. These facts are verifiable: * Kelly was first introduced to Dee as "Edward Talbot", but by November 1582 is thereafter referred to as "Edward Kelly". The fact that he had a brother (Thomas) also named Kelly suggests rather that the name "Talbot" was false than vice versa. * Kelly did have the red powder. It is attested to by Dee in both his personal diaries and in the Spirit Diaries. * Whatever its source, Kelly's copy of the Book of Saint Dunstan also existed, and appeared at the same time as the red powder and the mysterious scroll. * The "indecipherable text" was found by Dee to be a simple cipher, which he decoded and included in his Spirit Diaries, along with its translation. It purports to be a treasure map, and was in all likelihood a forgery. * These do not appear until 23 March 1583 (Kelly had been working as Dee's skryer for over a year) and were found at Northwick Hill, not Glastonbury. The best sources for the *legend* of the two phials of red and white powder of projection, the Book of Saint Dunstan, and the digging at Glastonbury are Elias Ashmole's account in his "Theatrum Chemicum Britannicum", Waite's "Alchemical Writings of Edward Kelly", and "Alchemists Through the Ages" (edited by Waite). which will refer the reader who cares to pursue the matter further to additional sources. The best sources for the actual activities of Edward Kelly and the powder of projection can be found in Dee's "A True and Faithful Relation...", edited by Meric Casaubon, particularly the sections around 1586. Reading Kelly's alchemical works and Dee's Spirit Diaries paints a different picture of him than the shady rogue legend would have us accept. One way or the other, he is definitely a larger than life character. Incidentally, August 1st celebrates the 441st anniversary of Kelly's birthday, a significant number for the man who skryed the "Sigillum DEI Aemeth" in Dee's crystal, and who wrote "I venture to hope that my life and character will so become known to posterity that I may be counted among those who have suffered much for the sake of truth." The word "Aemeth" in Hebrew means truth, and has the value of 441 by gematria. Perhaps Ashmole's biographical sketches of Dee and Kelly from the "Theatrum..." ought to be typed up and submitted to Adam's web-site. If nobody else wants to offer, I guess I can do it in the next couple of weeks. Clay Clay Holden Subject: 1427 Tyson Date: Fri, 26 Jul 96 08:33 NZST From: Pat Zalewski George Having the air of knowing, and knowing, are two completely different things. Pat zalewski Subject: 1428 Julius de Evola and C.G. Jung Date: Fri, 26 Jul 1996 15:52:01 -0500 (CDT) From: John C. Merritt > From: Stuart Inman > > I view fascists, racists and similar riff-raff with horror. If Evola > was always of the far right then I would not find him to be an > exception. However, I am reminded that Milarepa, one of the most > important figures in the Tibetan Buddhist tradition started off as a > mass-murderer. How did Evola end up? > > Stuart >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Another Italian philosopher with hermetic leanings and fascist politics was Giovanni Gentile, who did an edition of Bruno's Italian writings. Issue # 14 (Winter 1990) of 'Gnosis' has two articles on Evola, one of which deals specificaly with his fascist connections. On Jung and the Nazis, see 'Lingering Shadows: Jungians, Freudians and Anti-Semitism' edited by Aryeh Maidenbaum and Stephen A Martin (Boston: Shambala, 1991). ----------| John Merritt | beowulf@bga.com |--------- Subject: 1429 Ayurvedic Alchemy Date: Fri, 26 Jul 1996 16:28:17 -0500 From: A'yin Da'ath Hello everyone. I just got a copy of the ...Of the Jungle Catalog today, and noticed mention of 'Ayurvedic Alchemists' when discussing some plants. I'm curious about exactly what they mean by this, and was curious to see if anyone has any further information about this topic. They're Indian, are they not? Is their alchemy different from the Western 'hermetic' tradition? Is it different from the Eastern, Chinese tradition? Exactly how does it fit in, and also what connection does it have with botany? Oh, before we get into this, let me add that the mention was in a description of a psychoactive plant. I don't want to get into any heated debates over that stuff (it belongs on a different list) again. If you plan on saying anything to the effect of 'ethnopharmacology, psychoactivity, drugs, or anything like this have no connection with alchemy,' then please do not respond. If you can add anything of content, then please do. ayindaath@worldnet.att.net Subject: 1430 Julius de Evola and C.G. Jung Date: Sat, 27 Jul 1996 01:06:15 +0200 (MET DST) From: douwe >From: Stuart Inman >I view fascists, racists and similar riff-raff with horror. If Evola >was always of the far right then I would not find him to be an >exception. However, I am reminded that Milarepa, one of the most >important figures in the Tibetan Buddhist tradition started off as a >mass-murderer. How did Evola end up? Funny that you thought of Milarepa.., I too have thought about the same man in this very same context... Just how the sorcerer turns to become the saint, is not such a strange happening, most Saints started off as lawbreakers... I still wonder about the information about Jung. I only know that he predicted WW-2 as some delayed reaction on WW-1 through which mass-dissatisfaction would lead to a mass neurosis. I also seem to remember that he foresaw the dangers of Hitler, probably as a classic psychological case of that kind :-) I can't exactly remember where I have read this, it might be his 'dreams and reflections' or such. Further I thought to have read that he just kept a low profile, just doing research and treating his patients, just like most intellectuals, not very much bothered by politics at all, apart from some psychoanalytical viewpoint maybe. I am not sure if all this fascist hunting is in it's place here, you take from a work what you need, if you feel that it is worthy enough for you to learn from, fine... B.T.W. Someone once blamed me for being a fascist, because I happen to like Nietzsche, Steiner, and Wagner too, and those three together, well that is a concoction of fascism. There are probably enough people around who enjoyed the alchemical writings of Edward Kelly, and I am sure that a lot found them to be very valuable while his reputation doesn't seem to be so great when it is taken at face value. The same holds true of Paracelsus and many other great names... douwe. darus@xs4all.nl Sapientae apex, desperatio de rebus mundi. Subject: 1431 Alchemical Tarot deck Date: Fri, 26 Jul 1996 19:57:54 -0400 From: Rawn Clark In a message dated 96-07-26 07:46:11 EDT, you write: >Maybe I'm an "old-time-lover" - but most of these compilations seems to lose >both the original symbolism of Tarot, and the symbolism of Alchemy. >(Maybe this is not the case...) > >Recent times (the past 100 years) launched a lot of Tarot derivates, which >are just "somehow similar to Tarot", but make a total mix of ideas and >symbols. >Then the original Tarot, used to encryption (for example Sefer Jecira), etc. >gets spoiled and lost by these... With new and new Tarot decks comes the >danger of losing the only true original one and the traditions bound to >it... > >Correct me, if I'm wrong... > >Semi. Dear Semi, I disagree (though I can't speak specifically to this new Alchemical Tarot) with your comments for several reasons: 1) Tarot, like Alchemy, is a living tradition, not a static thing. The mere fact of the existence of so many tarot, and pseudo-tarot, decks is proof of this, regardless of what one may think of each individual deck's worth. And this Alchemy Forum alone, evinces the aliveness of Alchemy! ;) Living things evolve and continuously re-interpret the past into the context of the present moment, and visa versa. These new Tarot decks seem just a natural part of Tarot's evolution. 2) We each cherish the mythology we choose, no? A very popular mythology of the Tarot is that is has ancient Egyptian (or any other land of personal choice) origins, having been passed down occultly through the millennia. While this is *symbolically* meaningful, it is just as historically untrue as are the mythologies surrounding the origins of the Torah, the New Testament, the Emerald Tablet of Hermes, and probably most of our sacred texts. I think it is important to separate mythology from history when we consider the origins of Tarot and especially when we speak in such dogmatic terms as "the only true original one". 3) We are five centuries into a long rush of new Tarot decks...some of them have been real gems. The oldest known decks of Tarot have been recently reprinted, so I doubt there is much chance of our losing sight of modern Tarot's roots. 4) While I don't find any direct historical evidence that the Tarot was originally intended to depict the principles of the Sepher Yetzirah, I do find ample evidence that it was *later* in Tarot's history that these correspondences where drawn. Nonetheless, this Qabbalistic-origin theory has become a part of the popular mythology of Tarot, the importance of which is amply demonstrated by the fact that most of us have learned to use Tarot based on these Hermetic-Qabbalistic correspondences. Jewish Kabbalists flatly refute any correlation between Hebrew Kabbalah and the Tarot, and to me, the modern Tarot's correspondences are clearly of the Hermetic-Kabbalistic branch and not direct off the Hebrew root. So, even accepting a Qabbalistic root, that root is from a fairly recent branch. I would agree however, that Tarot has *become* Qabbal-ized. ;) 5) Further, there are many differing traditions of the correspondences between Tarot and Qabbalah. I can reach behind me to my library and find at least a dozen conflicting systems! Oddly enough, each claims to be the right one, but in reality, each is only one of many interpretations. This is no less true for Alchemical symbolism! Personally, I cherish the opportunity of access to so very many different perspectives on the world. While I hold and cultivate my own unique perspective, I find it is often another's perspective which intiates my own growth. So I say "right on!" to anybody who has the guts to put forth their own interpretation...I think it simply adds to our choices, whether we find the options presented to be to our personal liking or not. We are, after all, always brought back to the main point, which is the making up of our own minds for ourselves. Best to you, :) Rawn Clark 26 July 96 Subject: 1432 Piaget on The Work Date: Sat, 27 Jul 1996 01:01:32 GMT From: Lewis Goudy The following passage seems, well, canonical: Knowledge is not a copy of reality. To know an object, to know an event, is not simply to look at it and make a mental copy, or image, of it. To know an object is to act on it. To know is modify, to transform the object, and to understand the process of this transformation, and as a consequence to understand the way the object is constructed. An operation is thus the essence of knowledge; it is an interiorized action which modifies the object of knowledge. I have this as a third-hand quote: J. S. Wiggins, et al. The Psychology of Personality Addison-Wesley 1971 p.527 quoting from F. G. Jennings, "Jean Piaget: notes on learning" Saturday Review May 20,1967 quoting from (I'm asking you.) The content suggests a (prospective?) reconciliation of the Scientific and Hermetic views of nature--or points up the artificiality of distinguishing them. Lewis R. Goudy lrgoudy@usa.pipeline.com Ignorant Pilgrim & Nervous Newbie Subject: 1433 Alchemical Tarot deck Date: Fri, 26 Jul 1996 18:16:01 -0700 From: Dennis William Hauck > From: Pat Zalewski > > >From: Dennis William Hauck > > > >Rosemary Eileen Guiley has just published an interesting Tarot Deck and > >accompanying book THE ALCHEMICAL TAROT which does an excellent job of > >connecting the archetypal symbolism of the two hermetic arts. It seems > >that much of the Tarot symbolism is based on the processes of alchemy. > >The book/card set is published by Thorsens, an imprint of HarperCollins. > > Could you post her alchemical associations to the trumps? The following is a very brief description of her interpretation of the Trumps: 0 FOOL: neophyte alchemist; prima materia. 1 MAGICIAN: does not represent an alchemical process because he is Hermes/Mercury - the goal and exalted matter of the Work. 2 HIGH PRIESTESS: represents processes of dissolution, ie., solution and separation. Archetypal Luna. Marks beginning of dissolution. 3 EMPRESS: the Alchemical Vessel of Body (Soul) in which the process of dissolution (especially, solution or the confrontation of ego with the unconscious) takes place. 4 EMPEROR: the Alchemical Vessel of Mind (Spirit) in which the process of dissolution (especially, separation or the use of critical faculties to discard ego illusion) takes place. 5 HIEROPHANT: Masculine counterpart to HIGH PRIESTESS. Archetypal Sol. Marks the end of the dissolution process. 6 THE LOVERS: Recombination; spiritual conjunction. 7 THE CHARIOT: Driver is progeny of THE LOVERS heated by energy of Sun and rises into the heavens; represents the process of sublimation. 8 JUSTICE: First of the feminine powers confronted by the Charioteer. Three pillars of the Tree of Life. Process of disposition. Weighing of Fire and Water elements; birth. 9 THE HERMIT: Turning inward to raise consciousness; process of exhaltation. 10 WHEEL OF FORTUNE: Represents an overview of the whole process; the Ouroboros; the fixed changing into the volatile. 11 STRENGTH: the Green Lion; process of fermentation; higher Life Force. 12 THE HANGED MAN: Crucified serpent of Mercury; calcination. 13 DEATH: nigredo; mortification; putrefaction; final death of ego. 14 TEMPERANCE: nurturing aspect of feminien powers; Mary the Jewess; distillation; five petalled rose. 15 THE DEVIL: imprisonment in matter; coagulation; Hermaphroditus. 16 THE TOWER: the athanor; higher order of dissolution. 17 THE STAR: purification; seven steps of process. 18 THE MOON: albedo; the White Stone. 19 THE SUN: citrinatis; second or greater conjunction of the heiros gamos; multiplication and projection processes. 20 JUDGMENT: the White Stone slowly turns into the Red Stone; healing and transmutation; resurrection. 21 THE WORLD: the Red Stone manifests; Anima Mundi; union of the Above and the Below. Each card has appropriate alchemical symbolism illustrating the above ideas. One of her goals is to prove that the Tarot is alchemical (at least Neoplatonic in origin) instead of Christian, and I think she does a good job of demonstrating her case. Subject: 1434 Pentadodecahedron as sigil? Date: Sat, 27 Jul 1996 02:37:28 GMT From: Lewis Goudy The pentadodecahedron is the twelve-sided solid whose faces are regular pentagons. Consider a "hemisphere" from same, i.e. a flower-like affair whose center and five petals are identical pentagons. Imagine that the edges which join these six pentagons are hinged and that these hinges each possess some agency that permits them to articulate themselves independently (but subject to the constraints they impose on each other by virtue of their positions). So the flower can open like a daisy or close like a tulip, or even bend over backwards into an anti-tulip, but not continue closing up beyond tuliphood (i.e. no self-intersections). Now suppose it is planar (in daisy mode). It looks very much like a regular pentagon, except there have been some rather small bites taken out of it. Suppose in this conformation the agencies responsible for articulation can agree to relinquish their autonomy so that the daisy becomes rigid. In this condition, missing wedges notwithstanding, it can serve as a single pentagon and so as an element (face) in a "metaflower", i.e. a higher order hemisphere. Suppose this metaflower itself possesses the aforesaid qualities possessed by its elements, so that as a metadaisy it in turn can serve as a single pentagon in a meta-metaflower. And so forth above ad infinitum (flowers prefixed with k "meta's" for each positive integer k). And likewise below: imagine the pentagons that we started with are not atomic but are themselves composite in the same manner, and likewise their constituent pentagons, and so forth ad infinitessimum. Now imagine not just such a hemisphere, but two such conjoined, i.e. the solid figure mentioned in the subject of this post (albeit with a bit of internal structure ). This self-similar infinitely ramified geometry of articulation has some properties that seem to render it naturally emblematic of a universe (or a person). It can enclose one region of space or many. It appears free at the local level but is subject to emergent constraints which are not revealed except from privileged perspectives. It can manifest infinite diversity of form yet possesses forbidden states and so cannot fairly be styled chaos. It possesses a distinguished state of plenary order or sublime unity. And so forth. I know this forum possesses deep reserves of historicism and insight. I am not schooled in your tradition. I would like to know if anything I have written here resonates with it. Lewis R. Goudy lrgoudy@usa.pipeline.com Subject: 1435 Enochian Apocalypse/John Dee forum Date: Sat, 27 Jul 96 07:56 BST-1 From: Graham Nickells Where is the John Dee forum? Graham Nickells ----------------------------------- I will reply here. You can subscribe the John Dee E-mail discussion group by sending an E-mail (from theaddress you wish to subscribe) to: JOHN_DEE-Request@fre.fsu.umd.edu with the word "Subscribe" in the body of the message. The John Dee discussion group is not particularly active, and there are only a few messages each month. With best wishes, Adam McLean Subject: 1436 Mosquito bites Date: Sat, 27 Jul 1996 08:46:28 -0400 From: J.F. Ruther I am looking for a prescription for something against mosquito bites. My wife and my daughter always react very allergically to mosquito bites, they get really great swollen bumps which are itching like hell. One time my daughter got twelve bites around her eye and the face was swollen so one eye was swollen closed for over two days. Myself and my son just get little spots which do not itch very much. Is there a alchemical/spagyrical prescription to either desensitize against the allergical reaction or to do something in prevention against the bites. Maybe also after the byte happened? It must have something to do with the blood and the sweath of the person. Perhaps there is something out of the animal kingdom, to be prepared out of mosquitos? Yours.... J.R. Subject: 1437 Piaget on The Work Date: Sat, 27 Jul 1996 08:41:01 -0500 (CDT) From: cbr Lewis Goudy wrote (quoting, I believe, Piaget): > Knowledge is not a copy of reality. To know an object, to know > an event, is not simply to look at it and make a mental copy, or > image, of it. To know an object is to act on it. To know is modify, > to transform the object, and to understand the process of this > transformation, and as a consequence to understand the way the > object is constructed. An operation is thus the essence of > knowledge; it is an interiorized action which modifies the object > of knowledge. Goudy suggests > The content suggests a (prospective?) reconciliation of the > Scientific and Hermetic views of nature--or points up the > artificiality of distinguishing them. The analogy seems apt, and brings up a point of theory. Many of the people who apparently do work in alchemy and post to this list as well assume a strict dualism; that spirit and matter are in practice (?) and in point of fact (not just conceptually) separable. And on the literal level at least (and I must confess that I am not well read beyond such an understanding) much of alchemical writing seems to assume such a disjunction. However, the theory underlying understanding such as expressed above (Piaget and others in psychology, phenomenologists and others in philosophy) belies a commitment to a dualistic world; the unifying structure between what is derivatively representational knowledge and the object of that knowledge is variously conceived as the structures of human understanding itself, or humanity's native capcity to disclose its world at all, so that our embodiment is fundamental, not only to our empirical relation to the world, but to abstract forms of knowledge at all. How centrally do the various respondants to this list conceive dualism? How important is it to imagine the great work as one of somehow liberating spirit from matter? How much is it a construction of the psychological interpreters (Jung et al) to take such references as allegorical? Regards, Chris Subject: 1438 Ayurvedic Alchemy Date: Sat, 27 Jul 1996 12:54:14 -0400 From: Russ House Excerpts of the original message: >From: A'yin Da'ath >I just got a copy of the ...Of the Jungle Catalog today, and noticed mention >of 'Ayurvedic Alchemists' when discussing some plants. >They're Indian, are they not? Is their alchemy different from the Western >'hermetic' tradition? Is it different from the Eastern, Chinese tradition? >Exactly how does it fit in, and also what connection does it have with botany? I will respond, even though this topic is one where I have *very* limited information and no background in the practice. [Since when do we have to be knowledgeable to offer opinions? ;-) ] I consider Ayurvedic alchemy as quite different from most of the so-called Hermetic tradition of Western Alchemy. It is possible that there are some common roots in antiquity, and hopefully some other forum members can address this issue. I know of at least one member who has considerable practical experience in both traditions. (Hint) I suspect that Paracelsus was influenced by Ayurveda, since I see some similarities in the formulas, although the methods of working are different. Frater Albertus exposed his students to the 'tri-dosha' theories, gem therapies, and color therapies of Ayurvedic tradition, though I doubt that any of the lab practice incorporated these ideas. Some of the books that may be of value: "The Yoga of Herbs" ISBN 0941-524248, Dr, David Frawley, Dr. Vasant Lad, Lotus Press. -- Quote: "Rasa preparations. These are special Ayurvedic alchemical preparations using humanized forms of mercury, sulphur, and other metals. Called rasa preparations, they are important in Rasayan or rejuvenation therapy, and have a powerful action on the nervous system. Other special mineral and metal preparations are used (often in the form of specially incenerated ashes or bhasma, which renders them non-toxic to the body.) There are combined with herbs according to the same science of energetics. "Ayurvedic Medicine" by Birgit Heyn, Thorsons Publ. Group, UK, ISBN 0-7225-1417-4. "Ayurveda, The Science of Self-Healing" by Dr. Vasant Lad, Lotus Press, ISBN 0-914955-00-4. A very good overview, with many practical ideas. The rest of these were published in India (but in English), and may be harder to come by: "Rasa Jala Nidhi" or Ocean if Indian Chemistry, Medicine and Alchemy", in 5 volumes, by Bhudeb Mookerjee. Publisher: Srigokul Mudranalaya, K. 37/120, Gopal Mandir Lane, VARANASI-221001, India. Lots of Ayurvedia alchemy, with formulas. Quote: "Making of Gold: Iron, very finely pwwdered, is to be mixed with the juice of kanya, and burnt very carefully for three times, by means of putapaka. The powder will thus turn yellowish-red. Again, powdered makshika is to be mixed with rock salt and some sour juice, and subjected to putapaka for three times. These two kinds of powders are to be mixed together in equal quantities. To these will have to be added powders of silver and copper, each equal in quantity to each of the above mentioned powders, so that the amalgam contains an equal quantity of the four ingerdients, viz, iron, makshika, silver and copper. All of these arte to be heated together with a little lead being put in the crucible, every now and then, so long as the heating continues. The heat will have to be applied so long as the silver does not dusappear altogether -- nay, up to a little while after that. The product is a yellow metal containing gold 6/16 parts fine. Add to this, gold 10/16 part fine, the product being gold of an excellent quality." "A Handbook of Ayurveda" by Bhagwan Dash and Manfred Junius", 1987,Naurang Rai, New Delhi. Junius is considered a master of Western Alchemy (his Handbook of Plant Alchemy is one of the finest practical books), in addition to his long study of Ayurveda, Indian music, etc. Despite this, there is not much insight as to any common origins of Western/Ayurvedic traditions. The following are more for reference, and are not introductory. "Materia Medica of Indo-Tibetan Medicine", Vaidya Bhagwan Dash, 1987, ISBN-81-85132-00-3. "Madhava Nidana -- Ayurvedic System of Pathology" by K.R.L. Gupta, Sri Satguru Publ., ISBN 81-7030-130-0. "Ayurvedic Materia Medica", by H.V. Savnur, Sri Satguru Publ, 1988. "Diagnosis and Treatment of Diseases in Ayurveda" by Dash Kashyap, Concept Publ. Co, New Delhi, 1984. Materia Medica of Ayurveda, in 5 Volumes, by Bhagwan Dash, Lalitesh Kashyap, Naurang Rai, Publ., 1987 Regards, Russ House alchemy@mcs.com ==================================== -- The Philosophers of Nature alchemy@mcs.com http://www.mcs.net/~alchemy Subject: 1439 Mosquito bites Date: Sat, 27 Jul 1996 12:14:36 -0700 From: alyssa Try Deep Woods "OFF" to keep bugs away. For bites--baking soda and water or try bleach Cheers A Medieval Archaeologist Subject: 1440 Ayurvedic Alchemy Date: Sat, 27 Jul 96 21:07 BST-1 From: Graham Nickells I am not an expert, but I have found a few references in popular books on Ayurveda that may help. I cannot rely on the veracity, but here goes. One of the plants you saw mentioned may have been the famous SOMA plant, glorified in the 9th Mandala of Rig Veda. The 9th Mandala is all about the Moon, and is possibly equivalent to Yesod in the Cabalistic system. Several plants have been mooted as the probable source, but AFAIK, have not been positively identified. The harvesting process is ritualised, and depends on the phase of the moon, etc, assuming one can find the plant. Soma produces immortality. 'RASAYANA' Skt., Rejuvenation, literally 'the path of juice', a process of replenishment of the quality and the quantity of the body's fluids. Ageing means loss of juice; just as old leaves dry out. Rasayanas are preparations used to promote Ojas, a highly refined substance produced within the body, and derived principally thru sexual abstinence, in other words, semen. Ojas is essential for physical, mental and spiritual health. Rasayanas are also used to produce AMRTA, the nectar of immortality. 'Tantric alchemy was founded on attempts to convert mercury, which is esoterically the semen of Shiva, the god of transformation and death, into amrta.' Robert E Svoboda, 'Ayurveda, Life, Health and Longevity', Arkana books, ISBN 0-14-019322-7 Not so detailed on the philosophical front, but with a good summary of the Sankhya philosophy, essential to any understanding of the subject is: 'Ayurveda, Science of Self-Healing' Dr Vasant Lad, Lotus Press, ISBN 0-914955-00-4 There are many recipes for rasayanas that include mercury, but the likelihood of anything easily available in 'Ayurvedic' medicine is extremely unlikely to be 'alchemic', let alone include the metal. BTW, Ayurveda is founded on the Sankhya Yoga system of knowledge based on the hierarchies and structure of the universe reflected within man, particularly the four elements plus spirit. Any imbalances in these elements manifest as disease. Graham Nickells Subject: 1441 Mosquito bites Date: Sat, 27 Jul 96 08:19 NZST From: Pat Zalewski >From: J.F. Ruther >Is there a alchemical/spagyrical prescription to either desensitize against >the allergical reaction or to do something in prevention against the bites. >Maybe also after the byte happened? >It must have something to do with the blood and the sweath of the person. >Perhaps there is something out of the animal kingdom, to be prepared out of >mosquitos? >J.R. I had a friend who had the same problem when we were in New Guinea. Try taking homeopathic Ledum. Pat zalewski Subject: 1442 Mosquito bites Date: Sat, 27 Jul 1996 23:04:37 +0200 (MET DST) From: douwe >Is there a alchemical/spagyrical prescription to either desensitize against >the allergical reaction or to do something in prevention against the bites. >Maybe also after the byte happened? Maybe it is a idea to look for a mosquito-net for them, they are excellent things, because the best thing is not being bitten at all of course. Further: the fact that they get stronger reactions to the bites has to do with the female hormone... For taking the itch away... make a good amount of some sal-ammoniac from lemon-melissa (it shouldn't be hard, because it is a cheap herb, so you can do lots at once). Mix it with a tiny part of its distilled oils and mix this with its alcoholic part (it is necessary to use the least part of its oil, because if you use too much, then this excellent medicine will be too potent because it is automatically absorbed by the skin, so you might overdose on it a bit if you use it a lot.) You use it by putting a small amount of it on every bite.. the bite will, give a sting, stop to itch, and disappear soon. To keep the mosquitos away, you may use a bigger amount of oil, a tiny bit of the sal-armenak and some alcohol... this will work alright as a repellent. Still I think a mosquito net is the answer to the problem though. For quick release without having all of this prepared, use some sal ammoniac from any astringent herb, mix it with some cologne, or alcohol, and put it on the bite... this would do some good too. Well just in case you don't have any of these things at hand, then just get some sal-ammoniac from the shop, and put a small amount on the bites with a cotton ball. Good luck... douwe. darus@xs4all.nl Sapientae apex, desperatio de rebus mundi. Subject: 1443 Piaget on The Work/Dualism Date: Sat, 27 Jul 1996 17:40:26 -0400 From: Clinton R. Armitage Subject: Piaget on The Work > >How centrally do the various respondants to this list conceive dualism? >How important is it to imagine the great work as one of somehow >liberating spirit from matter? How much is it a construction of the >psychological interpreters (Jung et al) to take such references as >allegorical? > >Regards, Chris My understanding is that the essence of Alchemy is: First, the recognition that all of existence consists of polarities and that it is this duality which keeps the universe in motion and is responsible for the continuing differentiation transpiring in what we conceive to be the material world. Secondly, progress through " the great or greater work" consists of the reconciliation of these polarities by the individual alchemist as they come into view. As the Alchemist becomes free of the attraction or repulsion of each polarity he/she experiences an expansion of consciousness- his/her individual universe has expanded. In time, the duality no longer exists in his/her, now androgynous, universe. The "as above, so below" has become as one, the separation of spirit and matter no longer exists- matter is spirit, spirit is matter. The wedding of the conscious and unconscious, the higher and the lower mind, takes place and with it the availability of universal mind. The Key is Love. Love is recognized as the universal solvent that dissolves all polarities. The Alchemist confronts the darker side of his/her universe with the shield of Love to protect him/her and eventually emerges into the light through the sword of intellect- understanding. Is there a parallel universe where Hate instead of Love is the universal solvent? Some call it Hell. Subject: 1444 Pentadodecahedron as sigil? Date: Sat, 27 Jul 96 19:06 EDT From: Josh Norton >From: Lewis Goudy > >The pentadodecahedron is the twelve-sided solid whose faces >are regular pentagons. Consider a "hemisphere" from same, i.e. >a flower-like affair whose center and five petals are identical >pentagons. >[snip] >This self-similar infinitely >ramified geometry of articulation has some properties that seem >to render it naturally emblematic of a universe (or a person). >[snip] >I know this forum possesses deep reserves of historicism and >insight. I am not schooled in your tradition. I would like to know >if anything I have written here resonates with it. It's not alchemical, but a cabalist magician once had some ideas that seem to parallel yours. Charles Stansfield Jones (aka Frater Achad) described them in his book 'The Anatomy of the Body of God'. In particular, Jones pointed out that if the cabalistic "Tree of Life" diagram is treated as a solid body with planar faces, then the bases of twenty such bodies can be fit together so as to leave no empty space. This done, the Kethers (i.e., the topmost points) of these bodies would would be so positioned as to form the apices of a pentadodecahedron. I haven't the faintest idea what it means, but it seemed so nifty that it ought to mean 'something'. Regards, Josh Subject: 1445 Mosquito bites Date: Sat, 27 Jul 1996 19:51:53 -0500 From: Michael Christopher Shaffer Try having them drink lemon water. One half lemon in a glass of water 3 times per day. Subject: 1446 Ayurvedic Alchemy, Rasayana, etc. Date: Sun, 28 Jul 1996 00:06:51 -0400 (EDT) From: Steve Feite Dear "A'yin Da'ath": >I just got a copy of the ...Of the Jungle Catalog today, and noticed mention >of 'Ayurvedic Alchemists' when discussing some plants. I'm curious about >exactly what they mean by this, and was curious to see if anyone has any >further information about this topic. Well, that is certainly a question that could take longer than a casual reply, but here goes. First, Indian Alchemy, or Rasayana first appeared in printed (read: written down on palm leaves that we have found) from over 1500 years ago. At the highlight of the written dispersal of Alchemical and Siddha Medicine texts, the Muslims began invading India--circa the 9th century A.D. Interestingly it is only after this knowledge began to circulate into western Europe--the 1400's--that Alchemy as we know it in the west "appears". The filter placed on our historical perceptions by archaeologists exploring the then mysterious and mystical Egypt, around the end of the last century--and the suppositions made by occultists since--that Alchemy originated there, in Egypt, is perhaps not in fact the truth. Alchemy certainly existed long before even the 9th century--references are made to Alchemical and medical usage of Mercury in the earliest Ayurvedic 'Samhitas' and dating well back before Christ (or Gautama for that matter). Recent excavations of the Indus valley civilization(s) has uncovered talismans and bracelets of solidified Mercury. In fact, these same items are still made today in "modern" India, and by French Alchemists living in India. To say that Alchemy, in this context, is *truly* a megalithic survival--a remant of megalithic science, if you will--is not as far fetched as it might seem. Secondly, this science, existing for so long, appears to have woven itself into the very fabric of ancient Indian society. Actually to say it has one source would be a misstatement. It appears in Ayurveda, yes. But it also comes from Siddha medicine. It also appears in Jyotish (Skt.:the Science of Light or Hindu Astrology). > Is their alchemy different from the Western 'hermetic' tradition? Is > it different from the Eastern, Chinese tradition? Exactly how does it > fit in, and also what connection does it have with botany? Actually it is very similar to the western--startlingly so. It is important to point out that the assertions made by some that Paracelsus had been to the trans-Himalayan/Indian region may be correct. Paracelsus' medical system has remarkable parallels not only with Ayurvedic humoural (Skt: Dosha) theory but also in his use of metals, his use of planetary talismans and his entire Microcosm-Macrocosm theme(s). Regarding Chinese Alchemy it is important to point out that Chinese Acupuncture originated in India as "Marma Chikitsa" the "gold needle" therapy. It was originally developed from the martial arts there, the so-called "Dhanur Veda" (lit.: "Science of War"). With this in mind it is easier to see where Chinese alchemy most probably came from. Chinese Geomancy, Feng Shui, contains elements of Indian Alchemy in their usage of Mercury and Arsenic--a further clue. The word "Rasa" means literally "essence". Its other meaning is "Mercury". Thus "Rasayana", the term oft applied to describe Indian Alchemy, means "the Path of Mercury" or "the Path of the Essence". Rasa also has other meanings in the Ayurvedic system too. In the description of the 7 tissues (Skt.: Sapta-dhatu, lit: the "seven spaces") of the human body and their interelation Rasa is 'first'. It is analogous to lymph in the physiology. My article on Mercury and Tantric Alchemy on the Alchemy Web site may also be of help. Yours in the Great Work, S.A. Feite Subject: 1447 Piaget on The Work/Dualism From: "John Chas Webb" Date: Sun, 28 Jul 1996 01:43:48 -1000 Response to Post # 1437 regarding spirit/matter dualism which asked (edited): | How centrally do the various respondants to this list conceive dualism? | How important is it to imagine the great work as one of somehow | liberating spirit from matter? How much is it a construction of the | psychological interpreters (Jung et al) to take such references as | allegorical? ********************************************************************** My own experience has convinced me of the following: 1) Spirit is without form, it is a raw power which is "concentrated" into forms by that aspect of selves which is represented by Hermes (the magician/mercury/the focusing agent). It does not distinguish between "good" or "evil", it is fundaMENTALLY a ceative power which MUST be directed. 2) Soul is an "individualized spark" of spirit which has been flavoured with particular attributes. The foremost of these attributes is consciousness with an ability to express itself into form. Soul operates both inside and outside of the boundaries of space and time. 3) "Form" is the "clothing" of the soul. A form can be an etheric form (eg. a "ghost" or "angel") or it can be a dense form (eg. a human being or etc., etc.). Form is temporal. These three aspects represent the trinity and also are the basis for Hermes' (the magician) title as the "Thrice-Greatest" s he mastered the blending and reblending of spirit, soul and form. Part of the reason why there is duality in alchemical texts is that some alchemists are utilizing powers to come into expression (coagulation) and others are "leaving" (diSOLVEing). We are unable to comprehend "spirit" because it has no attributes other than POWER. (The mind does not operate without first feeding it descriptions.) The mind can NEVER get to "spirit", the best that the mind can do is to remotely ponder the soul. Depending upon how we have configured our individual consciousness we can experience all matter as "divinized" or not. It is up to you how you want to set it up! The "original" design was intended to have "forms" as the vehicles of expression for individual souls (coagulation). However, if an individual soul has surrendered its power to form and the individual consciousness has "forgotten" its spiritual foundation then alchemy presents itself as a path which enables the practitioner to re-access the inner gold (the soul) and to extract it from the density (lead) of matter (disolution). The mastery of alchemy produces the Hermes archetype, which is an individual who is virtually unencumbered, who can manifest objects at will and who can enter into or leave form according to his or her will. He operates as a living soul and exists in perfect balance as a commander of spirit and master of forms. He translates spirit (above) into matter (form/below) and can reverse this process at will by transmuting his form back into the nothingness from which it issued. He makes REAL what many of us can only imagine (image, mage, magus, magic, magician, imagination). If your mind cannot accept this you must enter into the process of disolution so you can access the power to re-form the mind (mercury). Otherwise you remain "eternally" attached to form and die a hundred million deaths in the "underworld" of your own making. The Great Art is designed to restore one's status as an awakened soul who is free to travel to the farthest reaches of all of the universes and parallel realities. ("My Father's house has many mansions" - Christ) Cowabunga! John Charles Webb johnboy@aloha.net Subject: 1448 Julius de Evola and C.G. Jung Date: Sun, 28 Jul 1996 09:43:54 -0400 From: Jeffrey >I am new to this list, and study of alchemy. I have studied jung, among >others as a philosopher however, and have managed to remain >ignorant of the collaboration to which you point above. would you be >able to direct me to some of jung's works in which this is evident? > I would mightily appreciate the enlightenment. Jung's so-called collaboration with the Nazis is anything but a proven fact and remains controversial even in the Jungian world. There is no doubt that he was politically naive, but much of his "co-operation" with the Nazis was to help the Jewish members of the psychoanalytical society in Germany. He also tried to free Freud from Vienna in 1939 but Freud refused his help. There were no statements issued to help the Nazis, though they did use his concept of the racial unconscious for obvious purposes. I studied with several men who were Jung's clients during the war, one of whom was Jewish. He assured me that Jung was no Nazis and was never anti-semitic. As for judging an adept, I don't believe a person can be an adept and be, say a mass-murderer. But one must take great care in judging ethically any other individual, let alone one who operates in a different reality from the normal one. I would refer you to the 18 sutra of the Koran. Jeff Subject: 1449 Ayurvedic Alchemy, Rasayana, etc. Date: Sun, 28 Jul 1996 12:11:23 -0500 From: A'yin Da'ath Thanks for all the responses. Unfortunately (or not, as the case may be), they also have raised a few more questions- Would it then be safe to say that alchemy began as an Aryan (by Aryan, I do not mean Hitler's super-race and all that, but rather the 'ethnic' group which originated in Northern India, and moved westwards later on in successive waves (the Celts, the Goths and others) idea or concept? Secondly, since the article mentioned and specifically deals with plants (organic substances), and alchemy the western tradition talks mostly of inorganic materials, mercury, sulphur, salt, etc., could we then hypothesize that alchemy is a uniting of organic with inorganic substances, fusing into a... well, we're not quite sure what? Thanks for all the substantial responses again. ayindaath@worldnet.att.net Subject: 1450 Ayurvedic Alchemy Date: Sun, 28 Jul 1996 12:28:14 -0500 From: A'yin Da'ath >From: Graham Nickells >One of the plants you saw mentioned may have been the famous SOMA plant, >glorified in the 9th Mandala of Rig Veda. The 9th Mandala is all about >the Moon, and is possibly equivalent to Yesod in the Cabalistic system. >Several plants have been mooted as the probable source, but AFAIK, have >not been positively identified. The harvesting process is ritualised, and >depends on the phase of the moon, etc, assuming one can find the plant. >Soma produces immortality. Yes, I've heard of that idea, though only vaguely. From all that I know, the soma was possibly opium, or possibly the 'Fly Agraric' mushroom. I doubt we'll ever get the exact plant, or formula for the production of the plant. >'RASAYANA' >Skt., Rejuvenation, literally 'the path of juice', a process of >replenishment of the quality and the quantity of the body's fluids. >Ageing means loss of juice; just as old leaves dry out. > >Rasayanas are preparations used to promote Ojas, a highly refined >substance produced within the body, and derived principally thru sexual >abstinence, in other words, semen. Ojas is essential for physical, mental >and spiritual health. This is tantra, is it not? According to tantric sexuality, part of the process you can perform (and I have done so with reasonable success) is halting ejaculation. The texts, if I remember correctly (my memory isn't very good and I don't have them on me at the moment) say that by doing this the semen travels to the brain, somehow altering it. Now as far as this goes, I've heard multiple possibilities for the brain change. One was that it causes a psychedelic session (again, please, PLEASE do not yell and kick and scream because I'm bringing this up again. I do not hold with this theory anyways). A second was that it is more... occult(?)... in it's mannerisms, that is, it causes the sexual energy normally released at orgasm to instead be transferred and held in the head, or released via one or both of the two chakras there, the ajna or sahasrara (and possibly the visuhddi). The last is more scientific in explanation, and the one that I am most inclined to agree with. Simply, the body feels cheated in a sense because the entire sexual act was for nothing (no child will be produced). So it reacts by releasing more of the sexually charged hormones and other biochemicals in greater amounts. So we have brain change, of a sort, occuring because we have inordinate amounts of hormones flowing through the blood. Now, another practice that I know of and have tried is the repeated failure to achieve orgasm. If prolonged over a period of days, this can cause a little, at least, brain change. What happens is that the practioner has sex at least once daily, but instead of having an orgasm, stops right before (tricky, but possible). This is done multiple times in one night, or slowly over the course of two weeks. From my own experiences with this, all I felt after the one night stand trial was a greater feeling of vivacity, and orgasm was more potent when it finally came (no pun intended). This entire idea is similar to what happens with prolonged celibacy (according to most idealists, the celibacy of 'holy men and women' is done in order to achieve devotion towards god alone, without feeling of ties towards a family. I would disagree, that in fact the prolonged celibacy somehow affects the mind as well because of the body's feeling of failure to complete evolutionary goals). Any commentary, rebuttal, etc. is entirely wonderful, provided it maintains a status of decorum. ayindaath@worldnet.att.net |